Whilst the schools may have broken up for the holidays, events around the development continue to move on.
Thanks to everybody for the steady stream of copies of feedback to the Marino Family Trust over their woeful exhibition. It is clear that rather than assuage any concerns about the development the lack of detail in the exhibition had much the opposite effect. There has been a good deal of press coverage with an article in both the Wokingham Times, and also an article published in the local papers over in Hampshire highlighting how Eversley residents were ignored in the limited promotion for the exhibition. It is interesting to note the disagreement between MFT and Wokingham over whether Eversley should have been included with MFT saying Wokingham asked them not to send details to addresses in Eversley, whereas Wokingham are saying that they were only asked for addresses in specific parishes.
The article that appeared in this weeks Wokingham Times, which has yet to appear online also asked Curtin and Co, the representatives of the Crest Nicholson led consortium developing the northern part of the SDL about their upcoming consultation. Disappointingly they told the paper that they are planning to mount their consultation during August at the height of the summer holidays when many people will be away, a decision that runs contrary to their supposed desire to consult as widely as possible. There are also comments from Arborfield councillor Gary Cowan highlighting concerns that the applications from the two groups must be considered together.
Much like Curtin and Co and Crest Nicholson, Wokingham Borough Council is also continuing to make key decisions during the holiday period. The agenda for the Executive Meeting this Thursday, 31st July contains a number of important issues. Firstly the new secondary school for the south comes up under item 31. The report amongst the agenda papers highlights the ambitious schedule the council has set themselves, and in the section on capital funding highlights this as a key challenge due to the school being brought forward well in advance of when the funding from developers will be available. Whilst there is now an enthusiastic parent reference group organised by the council in operation, it is fair to say that confidence amongst parents whose children fall into the critical period for secondary transfers is not high. We are aware of families moving out of the area purely because they do not believe the council will deliver, with other families that can afford to looking seriously at private education for their children because they know that their children will have no choice over which school they will go to. As a contingency we would urge Wokingham Borough Council to consider putting a fairer tie breaker in place for their four schools, perhaps based on the segmented Oakbank tie breaker, that would give parents in the southern parishes more confidence that they will have some choice over places should the council not manage to deliver a school as promised.
Also on the agenda for Thursday is designation of a combined neighbourhood plan area for Arborfield and Newland, and Barkham parish council areas. Ensuring we have a Neighbourhood Plan in place is very important as under the recent Localism Bill it provides additional funding to our local parishes from central government.
Whilst not directly related to our SDL, another interesting item is item 44, where it seems that Wokingham Borough Council is getting into the Pick Your Own Fruit and Veg business by buying Gray’s Farm over in Heathlands Road. Under the plan the farm, which was on the market anyway, will remain open until the end of the 2017 season, but then will close and become part of the South Wokingham SDL which abuts the farm to both the north and east. Following closure in 2017 it will be converted into the sports hub for the South Wokingham SDL. Whilst it is certainly sad to see a popular local business go, it is perhaps not surprising as the farm would not be nearly so attractive with thousands of houses surrounding it in a few years time, and with the council buying it that at least ensures that it will remain as open space rather than being picked up by a developer.
“Is that it?” about sums up the comments from a lot of residents who attended the two consultation afternoons put on by the Marino Family Trust and their representatives last Thursday and Saturday.
Things didn’t bode too well when we were given barely twenty-four hours notice of the first event. One of the first visitors e-mailed us shortly afterwards and said that he thought that the three display boards with identical content to the brochure we had received were the introduction, but when he asked he was told that was all there was. Another local resident who contacted us asked when the booking was made at Henry Street Garden Centre and was told it had been made three weeks previously. When he then asked why residents weren’t told at that point, the honest answer came back “We didn’t think we’d be ready”.
With regards to the Crest Nicholson/MoD consortium responsible for the other part of the Strategic Development Location the impression we’re getting is that after the embarrassment of withdrawing the planning application they are working hard on producing a good application this time around – they are certainly giving the impression of having upped their game. Given that the Marino Family Trust are local, and Roger Bullworthy their main representative is a familiar face at Community Forum meetings and also attended all of the consultation carried out by the MoD consortium last year it is a shame that the knowledge of key issues he would have built up didn’t translate into a better exhibition.
We are grateful to those residents who have shared their concerns with us, please also share your concerns with the Marino Family themselves using the contact details provided on the brochure. Unlike Crest Nicholson and the MoD who will build the houses and go, we understand that the Marino Family are going to continue to live locally, so up to now that has given us a level of confidence that they are aware of local issues and concerns – that confidence has taken rather a knock after this exhibition for many people.
A number of key points have been raised:
The brochure started with the line “We have the opportunity to create a high quality, well-designed and exemplary garden village at Hogwood Farm”, sentiments with which we’d agree. However as a first step in convincing us that the Marino Family have the plans to actually produce that, this exhibition left an awful lot to be desired.
After the short notice invitation to the Marino Family Trust exhibition of their development plans, we issued the following press release, and participated in a discussion on BBC Berkshire.
The second exhibition date and location is tomorrow from 2pm to 5:30pm at Henry Street Garden Centre in Arborfield. As Roger Bullworthy says in the interview below the Finchampstead afternoon was consistently busy, and they are there and happy to answer any questions you may have.
Arborfield and Finchampstead residents have slated developers over, what appears to be, a cynical ploy to discourage people from viewing plans for a 1,500 home mini-town proposed on local farm-land.
Arborfield Garrison Resident’s Action Group (AG RAG) says the number of people who have contacted them complaining that they have been given less than 24 hours’ notice to view plans put forward by the Finchampstead based Marino Family Trust for the mini-town, which includes a neighbourhood centre and school, is unprecedented.
A spokeswoman for AG RAG, Gill Purchase, explains.
‘Residents received a brochure with basic information about the proposals for the ‘Hogwood Garden Village’ on Wednesday. It invited residents to view and comment on the plans the following afternoon, with a further exhibition planned for just three and a half hours on Saturday at a further location in the area. It is the first time the plans have been made public and most people were not aware of the exhibition until AG RAG posted details on social media sites.
Ms Purchase says. ‘This highlights the fact there is no intention for any meaningful dialogue between these developers and the public. The MOD and Crest Nicholson showed similar complacency when they organised public meetings just prior to Christmas in 2010, so we are hoping that the next round of consultation they carry out will be arranged to ensure the maximum number of people can attend and voice their views’.
She adds. ‘The whole rushed process is just a cynical move to ensure they (developers) can tick the box for having conducted public consultation when they put the planning application in five days’ time. Any reputable organisation that is serious about getting the opinions of local residents would give adequate notice – weeks not hours – and would not plan to arrange the consultation period when significant numbers of people who would be interested and would like to comment are likely to be on holiday’.
The proposals for the 1,500 mini town are in addition to the 2,000 homes proposal being put forward by the MOD for the Arborfield Garrison.
As you may have seen from the e-mail from the council, or in the glossy brochure posted through many doors in the area, the Marino Family Trust are finally ready to share with residents their plans for “Hogwood Garden Village” the southern part of the Arborfield SDL that sits entirely within Finchampstead.
Typically despite all their promises over the months the council was notified of the public consultation on Tuesday 15th July, residents received the brochures on Wednesday 16th July, and the consultation is on Thursday 17th July at the FBC Centre and Saturday 19th at Henry Street Garden Centre – giving residents about 24 hours notice.
The whole rushed process is just a cynical move to ensure the trust can tick the box for having conducted a public consultation when they put the planning application in before the end of the month, as any reputable organisation that is serious about getting the opinions of local residents would give adequate notice – weeks not hours, and wouldn’t arrange the consultation in a period when significant numbers of people who would be interested are likely to be on holiday.
The Marino Trust has been preparing this application for over a year – some residents will have met their team back at the Community Planning Weekend in January 2013, and now the key element of public consultation is rushed out.
Despite their cynical efforts to make it difficult for residents to attend we would urge as many people as possible to attend the exhibition and share their opinions with the team. They claim that any comments we make will be fed back into the application – although given that this is to go in by the end of July quite what changes they can make at this short notice remains to be seen.
The exhibition will be at the FBC Centre in Gorse Ride, Finchampstead from 2pm to 7pm tomorrow, Thursday 17th July 2014, and from 2pm to 5:30pm on Saturday 19th July 2014 at Henry Street Garden Centre in Arborfield.
This week there is a bit of a bumper crop of news and information to share.
Firstly, the new Reading Buses Leopard service kicked off on Monday. Whilst there have been a couple of issues we have heard about with regards to fares not being correct, in general the new service seems to be going down well. Having taken a trip into Reading on the new service the buses certainly are more attractive than the old 144 buses, but we shall see over the coming weeks how the new provider performs. As the new development starts to be built, a key part of the plan from both the developers and Wokingham Borough to try and stop the whole area grinding to a traffic choked halt is to get many more of us residents out of our cars onto buses. Whilst these new buses are attractive, it still takes an hour to get to central Reading, so we are doubtful that the developers can achieve the kind of spectacular switch to public transport they are hoping for. However Reading Buses seem keen to make a good impression, so if you have any problems, or want more information they can be contacted directly on 0118 959 4000 or through their website.
Looking at other road issues we have heard via Gary Cowan that as part of the ongoing work towards the Arborfield Bypass/Relief Road the initial line of route B is due to be marked out by a line of posts across the fields to the west of the village. The posts will represent the centre line of the current proposed alignment and will be used to guide a technical walkover comprising councillors, land owners, council officers and the engineering design team over the coming weeks. The posts do not represent the final alignment of the road, but will be used to inform discussion about what the impacts of the route will be.
After his commitment to try to return a post office to Arborfield, following the sudden “temporary” closure of the only remaining post office by the Ministry of Defence last year, Gary also let us know that the Arborfield Shop has now been sold to new owners who will move in sometime in July, and he is hopeful that the new owners will reinstate a post office.
Further down the A327, Hampshire County Council are currently consulting on their proposed improvements at the junction with the A30. As you may know, the junction is currently the second highest ranked accident blackspot in the whole of Hampshire, with an ongoing catalogue of serious accidents over the years, as such Hampshire County Council has managed to obtain Government funding to replace the current staggered crossroads with a roundabout. Sadly the funding is not enough to totally sort the junction out, so there is a planned phase two to connect in the fourth exit off the roundabout. Until that is completed traffic for Fleet will be sent up and around the Blackbushe roundabout, however despite this the proposed work should sort out a lot of the problems and hopefully alleviate some of the delays. The replacement of this junction, and provision of bypasses for Arborfield and Shinfield increasingly highlights the main remaining problem area along the length of the road, being the stretch along the Street in Eversley and Reading Road in Finchampstead, and we will continue to press for meaningful action on this stretch too. To view detailed plans of the proposed work, which is due to commence at the end of the summer and be completed by March 2015, and to submit comments please go to the Hampshire County Council web site and fill in their quick survey form on the improvements.
Wokingham Borough Council finally seems to be making some visible progress towards opening a secondary school in the area for September 2016. As mentioned previously we have commitments from a number of high ranking councillors and council officers that they are focused on finally making a school for the south of Wokingham a reality after decades of trying. Brian Grady, the Head of Strategic Commissioning is organising a parental reference group that will provide the main parental input into the design and planning process for the school. Currently Wokingham Borough Council are going for evening meetings, however they are open to holding sessions at other times of the day for parents who are unable to make the evening meetings, so if you are keen to be involved but can’t make the times, please contact Brian. The current proposed dates, times and locations are as follows:
30th June 7.30pm – WBC Shute End, David Hicks Room
21st July 7:30pm – WBC Shute End, David Hicks Room
18th August 7:30pm – WBC Shute End, LGF4
15th September 7:30pm – WBC Shute End, David Hicks Room
20th October 7:30 – WBC Shute End, LGF4
17th November 7:30 – WBC Shute End, David Hicks Room
15th December 7:30 – WBC Shute End, David Hicks Room
All are welcome to participate in the group as Wokingham are keen to get the views of as many parents and interested parties as possible. If you wish to take part, please contact Brian directly via e-mail to [email protected].
Firstly, as those people who are on the council mailing list will know, the Arborfield Community Forum scheduled for next Thursday has been postponed. We are hopeful that the reason for the postponement is because there is something significant to present, as we are moving closer to the estimated date of a new planning application, but as yet we don’t have any more information than the reason given by the council.
Moving on, Cllr Keith Baker was elected as leader of the council to replace outgoing leader Cllr David Lee. As we highlighted previously Cllr Baker was initially unwilling to back the promise made by Cllr Lee to provide a new school in the Arborfield area to open in September 2016, so we had a question in at the meeting asking for him to give that assurance, and also to back the election commitments on the bypass, broadband provision and provision of a Post Office. We are pleased to report that on this occasion Cllr Baker backed the key commitments made by his predecessor on the school and reiterated his commitment given at the community forum to the bypass. He also said that the council offered full support to Gary Cowan’s personal commitments on broadband provision and over the Post Office. As a follow up question we highlighted concerns over what would happen to the current proposed school location in the SDL if the council places the new secondary school somewhere else, and highlighted concerns that moving the school would result in an increased number of houses on the SDL site.
At this point we’d just like to record our thanks to David Lee as he stands down as leader of the council, we’ve obviously given him some tough questioning at various meetings and in various forums over the years, but he has always been willing to talk to us as local residents and listen to our concerns. We look forward to continuing to work constructively with Cllr Baker in his new role, and with whoever gets executive responsibility for strategic development locations in his place – a post that will be announced next month.
Finally, many of you have noticed the appearance of some strange blue marks on trees in parts of the Garrison, and given the unauthorised felling of one of the trees nearby have expressed concern that more may follow. We have been liaising with Matt Melville who has received assurances from the developers that the marks on the trees are not identifying candidates for felling. The developer teams are currently tracing underground services as part of their ongoing detailed surveying of the site, and the blue marks on the trees indicate services running under the copse of trees. Thanks to everybody who has emailed both ourselves and the council about the trees, please if you see anything else going on in and around the site about which you are concerned, do not hesitate to get in contact and we can ask questions and find out what is going on.
I would be a foolish politician to guarantee anything in this world
These were the words of new leader of Wokingham Borough Council, Cllr Keith Baker, talking to Andrew Peach at the end of his show on Friday.
But if you roll the clock back a week, have a listen to his predecessor Cllr David Lee debating the Arborfield School proposals with leader of the Wokingham Liberal Democrats Cllr Prue Bray on the local election debate programme that Andrew Peach hosted.
In that clip, Cllr Lee says that a new secondary school will be open in the Arborfield area in September 2016 several times, against repeated comments from Cllr Bray that the timescale is optimistic, and that she doubts the council will be able to do it. The former South of Wokingham Free School group have raised similar questions ever since the guarantee of an academy school in 2016 was made earlier in the year. Newly re-elected councillors Gary Cowan in Arborfield, and Rob Stanton in Finchampstead in particular made much of the promise in their manifesto commitments, a copy of the Arborfield manifesto is available here and the school is highlighted in the borough wide section on page 2, and Gary himself commits to campaign for the school in his personal points on the first page. Cllr Charlotte Haitham Taylor, who wasn’t up for election this year also made several public commitments to a school in 2016, as did senior council officer Brian Grady, who will be ultimately responsible for delivering the school.
So for many people it was somewhat of a surprise when in his first interview as the newly announced leader of Wokingham Borough Council, Cllr Keith Baker came out with this:
Certainly you can argue, as I’m sure the new leadership at Wokingham Borough Council will, that he still described a school in Arborfield as a priority, but it’s certainly not the kind of guarantee that Cllr Lee, Cllr Stanton and Cllr Haitham Taylor have been giving out before the election, nor is it the kind of commitment that was being made in the local manifesto. If anything Cllr Baker seems to be moving towards saying much the same as Cllr Bray and the Liberal Democrat group have been saying all along, which is that it is an ambitious plan to open a school in 2016 and that it might not be achievable. He is certainly suggesting that outgoing leader Cllr Lee, along with Cllr Stanton and Cllr Haitham Taylor were foolish to guarantee a school in September 2016.
So what is going on? Firstly it is worth remembering where Cllr Baker is based – unlike Cllr Lee, Cllr Stanton and Cllr Haitham Taylor he represents Coronation ward in the northern part of the borough around Reading. As we have highlighted before school places in the borough are not evenly spread across the borough, so even when there will be no local school places for parents in the south, there will still be places in schools further north such as Bulmershe, indeed even this year when some parents in the southern parishes didn’t get any of their choices in the secondary school allocation, there were plenty of free spaces at Bulmershe. The council is also spending a significant amount of money upgrading Bulmershe school, and has relatively recently rebuilt Waingels College, so for parents in the north that Cllr Baker will have been speaking to on the doorsteps, there are plenty of spaces, and clear investment in new facilities, so no great issue with secondary school places.
However for councillors in the south of the borough, the message they have been getting is very different, parents can see that there are places in Bulmershe, and don’t want to be sending their children on a daily trip across the borough, so not surprisingly the southern based councillors have been pushing for a school here to be brought forward sooner. We’re aware of parents locally who are moving house because of concern that their children will end up being sent to Bulmershe, and others that have said they will home school rather than send their children on such a long round trip. Wokingham Borough Council has been promising a school in the south for decades – we recently spoke to a long time local resident and grandmother collecting her grand children from a local school who was promised a secondary school in Finchampstead by the time her eldest child was 11 – he is now 41 and a school has still not been built. For many this is just the latest in a long line of promises and commitments for a local school that seems to be evaporating.
The failure to guarantee the school, not surprisingly puts other question marks over election promises. We are well aware that building houses at Arborfield is an expensive proposition in terms of the infrastructure that is needed. Whilst we certainly don’t think that the Liberal Democrat proposal to build 5,000 houses here to generate more infrastructure money is the right strategy, we know that the developers have never been keen on funding an expensive bypass. The council has pushed for a relief road, initially opting for a cheaper, shorter route, but then changing when public opinion clearly favoured route B, but to build this route the council may well have to borrow money in order to build it. Could we find the council backsliding on route B due to unforeseen circumstances?
Whilst Keith Baker may think a politician is foolish to guarantee anything, his predecessor and a number of colleagues have made that commitment. If he wants to add to the evidence that the school commitment was merely a ploy to get his councillors re-elected then so be it, alternatively Cllr Baker can show himself to be a politician of integrity and honesty, and stand by the commitments made in the local Conservative manifesto to a new school by 2016 and a bypass for Arborfield by his colleagues and his predecessor as leader.
With the significant increase in flyers being pushed through local doors, and poll cards turning up in the post, you will have gathered that it is election time again. However from conversations with our members there seems to be general apathy about whether it is worth voting locally at all, as one member said recently:
I just can’t be bothered to support a total load of lying untrustworthy politicians!
This is a sentiment we can certainly understand – over our campaign over the past few years we’ve had lots of conversations with our local politicians, and on a personal level they are helpful and supportive – for example local Arborfield member Gary Cowan has supported us as we have campaigned over the sudden closure of the Garrison Post Office last June, and has been supporting local residents campaigning for a new school for the southern parishes, attending every meeting. However get an election in prospect and they start saying and publishing stupid things that just make them look idiots.
Take the Free School campaign, one of the candidates in Finchampstead has been claiming on doorsteps that they were actively involved in the Free School campaign. That included on the doorstep of one of the members of the South of Wokingham Free School Group, who surprised that this person was claiming to be involved asked them which free school campaign as they hadn’t been at any of the South of Wokingham Free School discussions, indeed this particular candidate hasn’t even been at any of the council organised meetings either. Not surprisingly that produced a very uncomfortable looking candidate…
In Arborfield, we’re once again dragging over the old chestnut of “Liberal Democrats want to put xxxx more houses on the Garrison site” argument that the local Conservative campaign rolled out in 2010 and is digging up again. At various times it has been all 13,500, a Conservative flyer in 2010 said 12,000, this time it’s 10,000. All in all it is a really tiresome and totally pointless argument – the Liberal Democrats are so far off any real influence on the Borough council that they could win every single seat up for election this year and the Conservatives would still comfortably be in control, and it has been like that for years, even back in 2008 which is when the Conservatives claim this “policy” was published. The Liberal Democrats could have put forward a policy to recreate the Hanging Gardens of Babylon on Arborfield Garrison and it would have had the same chance of becoming a reality. The joke is that for someone like Gary Cowan who is this time pledging a clean campaign on one side of a flyer and putting rubbish like this on the other, the Liberal Democrats have regularly admitted that they would put more houses on Arborfield Garrison – the 5,000 that the developers have always wanted to put here, and still do, in fact Steve Bacon said as much in a flyer last election campaign. It is perfectly possible to put out a flyer that is honest about their policy using figures that the Liberal Democrats themselves have published, instead of once again presenting a figure that the Liberal Democrats claim is misrepresenting a statement from the Liberal Democrat Council Election Manifesto from 2008 which causes this same pointless shouting match again and again, repeated on BBC Berskhire just this last week. We’ve been through this same stupid argument in 2010, and we’re getting it again in 2014, is it little wonder locals think their politicians are liars and are put off voting altogether? We want to see a positive campaign, not one that drags over an irrelevant, pointless argument based on a six year old manifesto.
The other question that has come up from amongst members is about one of the five key campaign promises that the Conservatives made to the electorate in 2010, and whilst we understand the reasons why the promise was broken, given the interest we can’t not discuss it here. It is item number 2 on this flyer from Arborfield:
Benefit from Gary Cowan’s knowledge and experience. He will work with a new Conservative Government to abolish housing targets and ensure that only sustainable plans for housing in the area are adopted
Along with this comment in the main text:
The extra homes in Wokingham’s Core Strategy are required by the Labour government’s national policy and regional housing targets. If a Conservative government is elected they will abolish the high housing targets forced on Wokingham, leaving Wokingham Borough Council free to amend its plans and scale down the targets. If re-elected, as the lead Councillor for planning I would then ensure that our local plan was revised to spare the green fields of Arborfield. Arborfield knows I have its interests at heard, and Arborfield would benefit from having its Councillor as the Planning Head.
Conservative MP for Wokingham John Redwood even backed this plan up in the run up to the election, and also on doorsteps:
This means that if you help elect a Conservative government under these proposals people in Wokingham Borough will be able to choose fewer homes and lower densities of development. This would be something the Council could put into its plan without outside interference from the Region or Whitehall.
You can go back through our archives here for what happened after the election, needless to say that the numbers of houses in the core strategy today are exactly the same as they were before the 2010 election. What happened was that following the election the local council found that although the Labour regional strategies were abolished, other aspects, in particular housing land supply rules weren’t – the council still needed to provide land to build on, and the numbers required were much the same. Essentially the pieces had been rearranged a bit but the new government was just as keen to build houses in the south east of England as the defeated Labour government had been. It would be churlish to criticise the local councillors over their decision, had they cut the housing numbers it would have left the core strategy open to a challenge that under the new government rules would have allowed a developer free-for-all.
The simple fact to remember is that all the major parties nationally favour a major house building programme – the Conservative method is maybe a bit more carrot than the Labour stick, but the end result is still the same. Wokingham Borough could abolish their core strategy, but despite what it proposes for Arborfield, we would argue against anyone who tried to abolish it, as if it is removed, the current simplified planning rules would result in open season from developers. We may not like what the core strategy brings to Arborfield, but at least it gives the council some leverage to get the infrastructure the area desperately needs if it is to cope with the influx of houses and people that the building will bring – the core strategy is better than the alternatives.
So that brings us to who we support, the answer is simple, we don’t support or endorse any of the candidates, we will work with whoever the voters choose to represent them. Whoever is elected in Arborfield and Finchampstead the decision has already been made and the houses are coming to the Garrison. In Arborfield both Gary Cowan and Steve Bacon are long time village residents, and will be familiar faces to anyone who has attended the Arborfield Community Forums, and both have been active in putting forward their opinions, and both were fighting for route B to be selected for the bypass. Similarly in Finchampstead the candidates from the major parties will be familiar faces locally to those attending community forums and other local meetings. It is also worth remembering that whatever rubbish they may print about each other, or spout on the doorsteps, all of them live locally themselves and ultimately will want the best for the area as they have to live here too. Of course where they differ is in what they think is best for the area, which is where you as voters come in.
Going forward, this next four year period will see the main planning applications for the SDL brought forward and adopted, the Borough Council have made a clear and unequivocal commitment to a new secondary school by September 2016, and also the plans for the Arborfield Bypass will move forward significantly, and based on current plans the Garrison will have closed and the first houses will be being built. In 2018 we will have a much better idea of how Arborfield in 2026 will be shaping up. Who is it that you want representing you in this critical few years?
Over the past few days you may have noticed tree surgeons at work across the garrison area. As part of the process of moving forward the Strategic Development Location, Wokingham Borough Council has placed tree protection orders on large numbers of trees across the garrison area to try to ensure there is not a repeat of the large scale tree felling that occurred before previous developments commenced, and the understanding was that the MoD and Arborfield Garrison Landowners Consortium would honour those tree protection orders, even though on crown land the orders cannot be easily enforced (a TPO can only be enforced on crown land with the permission of the organisation responsible, so the council needs to ask permission from the MoD to prosecute the MoD for violating a TPO – ludicrous…).
Unfortunately it seems that the presence of TPO’s on a number of trees did not get passed on to those responsible for looking after the garrison grounds, so this is what is left of a TPO’d tree near the corner of Tyler Drive and Sheerlands Road. The council knew nothing about this tree being felled until it was reported, whereas any work on a tree under a TPO needs to be agreed with the council.
The justification for the work is the old “health and safety” chestnut – some of the branches were lost in the high winds this winter which meant that the tree was leaning, and therefore needed to be felled. Of course as any of you who know the tree in question would be able to point out, the tree has always leant slightly. Certainly given that a number of previous plans have suggested opening this part of Sheerlands Road up to through traffic and busses, reopening the old line of the A327 through the development, and removing this tree would make widening easier, there is a good deal of suspicion as to why the tree was removed.
The council are currently in consultation with the tree surgeons who cut down the tree, and with the MoD and AGLC. They will also ask for the tree to be replaced.
If you are aware of any other trees on the garrison that were felled over the past few days, can you pass on details to [email protected] or call on 0118 9746503 (manned 10am-3pm), copying details to ourselves. They have a complete plan of all the trees under TPO’s and will be able to take appropriate action to ensure any trees felled illegally are replaced.
Moving on, there have been significant changes over the school situation. Last week at the Secondary School meeting with parents, Rob Stanton and Charlotte Hatham-Taylor committed to having a new school open for residents of Arborfield, Finchampstead and Barkham in September 2016. This prompted a good deal of discussion amongst parents who had been pushing for a free school, and the decision was taken to halt the campaign. The reason for this is that in order to make it through the free school selection process the group has to show significant demand, and with parents from 2016 onwards now having been offered a council sponsored academy, only the 2015 parents were actively supporting the bid, the majority of the other parents were happy to opt for the council sponsored academy.
There remain question marks over the location, as the council is quite clear that the school will not open on a temporary site, however the most recent phasing plans showed the current school site in phase 1b between 2017 and 2019. We will continue to press the council for clarity on the school location, as if the school is not going to be in the currently planned location it is important to know where it will be, and what will be in place of the previous location.
Finally, the council executive meeting this week includes the next stage of the process for the Arborfield Bypass/Relief Road. Our colleagues on the Arborfield Action Group are intending to attend the meeting and ask a number of questions as the executive decides whether to allocate additional funding for the refinement of the chose route B that was favoured by 71% of respondents to the recent consultation. The meeting commences at 7:30pm on Thursday, 27th March, at the council offices in Wokingham.
Last night was the next in the regular series of Arborfield Community Forums held once again at the Henry Street Garden Centre in Arborfield.
There were perhaps two key items on the agenda for many residents, the first being an update from Roger Bullworthy on the Marino Family development plans, and the second being a more detailed review of the Arborfield Bypass/Relief Road consultation and details of the next steps. Alongside this the meeting also included more general updates on the development, an update on the ongoing secondary school consultation process, and details of the My Journey and Green Ways projects that are aiming to reduce car use across the borough.
Going through the agenda in order, the meeting started with Wokingham Principal Planning Officer, Matt Melville updating the meeting on current progress. Effectively this is that they still expect the planning application from the Arborfield Garrison Landowners Consortium for their 2,000 houses (of the total 3,500) in the autumn, and that there is a significant amount of work being done by the consortium to ensure a much better application is made this time around. Matt also highlighted the regular steering group meetings on which we are represented, and as mentioned by Matt we are happy to take any particular concerns residents may have to those meetings and report back.
Moving on, next to speak was Roger Bullworthy.
If you’ve attended a number of forum meetings, or the community planning weekend last year, Roger may well have been familiar to you, as although he hasn’t spoken publicly up to now he has been a regular attendee at the majority of the meetings relating to the development.
Roger highlighted firstly that the Marino Family are local, having lived in Finchampstead for a number of years, and intend to continue to live here once the development is completed, as such they are concerned to get the development right as just the same as other local residents they will have to live with the consequences of a badly designed development. In terms of design and layout they are intending to follow the modified version of the master plan as set out during the feedback from the community planning weekend last year.
Roger committed to the Marino Family delivering the Nine Mile Ride extension immediately development commences – this is of course important from the point of view of access to the district centre from the Finchampstead side. Another key point he made is that they are not going to be selling their land holding to a developer in one go, but will instead release land parcels over the whole development period, and whilst the individual developers who buy these parcels will specify their own house types, Roger assured the meeting that the Marino Family would sell the parcels such that anything that was built would conform to the overall master plan.
With regards to questions, the first questioner highlighted a common confusion that surrounds the SDL development in that he hadn’t realised that the Marino family land would hold an additional 1,500 houses. This is a point we have made on a number of occasions particularly to local media, the 2,000 houses on the MoD land are part of a total development of 3,500 – many local residents fail to realise that there are two separate land holdings and assume the reported 2,000 is the total!
Another key question that was raised was over the expanded Hogwood Lane Industrial Estate, and the extra traffic that would be generated. Roger took this to be concern that the expansion would include office blocks, and stated that the expanded industrial estate would all be classified as B2 General Industrial. However we are aware that a concern for many residents is the existing access to the site for HGV’s, some of which attempt to drive up Park Lane rather than come in on one of the slight less unsuitable roads such as Biggs Lane. As we have highlighted on a number of occasions, the industrial estate is really on the wrong side of the development and should really have direct access from the A327 – all HGV traffic for the estate currently has to go around on Biggs Lane, and once the Nine Mile Ride extension is complete will probably come in on that road, straight through the middle of the new housing development. The industrial estate expansion is being placed where it is because that is where the industrial estate is already, not because it is a good place on the overall development to put an industrial estate!
Moving on, next to present was Piers Brunning who updated the meeting on the ongoing consultation process with local parents on provision of a school in the South of the Borough. He also highlighted the next meeting specifically focusing on planning for the new school that takes place tomorrow night, Wednesday 19th March, at 7:30pm at the Finchampstead Baptist Centre. We understand that Wokingham Borough Council may be making some more announcements with respect to the school at the meeting tomorrow, and will report back anything that affects the SDL development.
After Piers had spoken, Steve Bailey gave a presentation on the My Journey and the Green Ways projects. Of most interest will probably be the Green Ways project that is looking to create a network of cycle, footpaths and bridleways away from major roads across the borough, connecting the new strategic development locations with other areas of the borough. The routes will make use of existing footpaths and byways where available, and in others will put in new paths.
We understand that there was some concern with the maps presented, as in a number of places they showed new paths going across land where the council has yet to speak to the affected landowners. There are other places where what are now simple footpaths are to be widened and upgraded to take cycle traffic and horses, again the landowners have yet to be consulted. As was noted in the questions from the floor, the planned network connects together the SDL’s, but misses key connections such as Wokingham Station, and secondary schools – connections that are key if we’re wanting to encourage students to cycle or walk. We’re certainly keen to see such a network come to fruition, however as with the initial stages of the bypass/relief road consultation it causes a good deal of concern from landowners if the first they hear of changes on their land is at a large public meeting such as the forum, and would urge the council to talk to the landowners before such announcements in future.
The final major item on the agenda was a more detailed review of the consultation results on the Arborfield Bypass/Relief Road.
The first and most important point is that thanks to the overwhelming response during the consultation period, the council is now actively pursuing route B. Steve presented a more detailed breakdown of the figures that indicated that route B was the overwhelming choice with everybody apart from respondents from the Farley Hill area. Given the level of response, this has pushed back the schedule for the building of the road, as the council is now going into an additional period of design work that is expected to be signed off at the next council executive meeting when route B is formally adopted as the preferred route. We must congratulate our colleagues on the Arborfield Action Group and our friends at Lockey Farm for the excellent campaign they launched which was highlighted by Steve Bailey as being key in mobilising responses and changing the council plan.
In response to questioning Steve highlighted that any plans would also show what changes would be made to the existing road through Arborfield and Arborfield Cross once traffic had been diverted away.
One particular point that was raised, which wasn’t adequately addressed was whether the developers would still be restricted to less than 750 houses until the road opened. The less than satisfactory answer was that currently this wasn’t going to be the case as the road would be built later as a result of the extra design time needed – as a result we could be looking at over 1,000 houses or more being built before the road would be finished assuming the current timings for planning are met. This led to a discussion about where the lorries to and from the SDL site would be routed, to which the answer is that they will probably come up and down the A327 either through Eversley or Arborfield. Little comfort for those who live on the road.
One bit of good news that was confirmed during the question and answer is that whilst the planned Arborfield Bypass doesn’t meet the new Shinfield relief road, leaving the stretch of road across the River Loddon exactly as it is currently, as a result of the major flooding that occurred this winter and the resultant closures of the A327, that stretch of road has been prioritised for flood alleviation measures, paid for by central government so we should get an improved road over the whole stretch of the A327 after all.
Whilst we are pleased that progress is being made on the A327, we continue to be concerned that this is not the only problem area, chief among the unaddressed areas is the next section of the A327 through Finchampstead and over the bridge into Eversley. Although it hasn’t been closed for long periods over the winter, the chaos caused by one set of temporary traffic lights and the resultant gridlocked traffic at peak times shows that this is a problem that needs to be addressed with more than just a change to the junction with the A30.
The next forum is on Thursday June 5th, at 7pm, again at Henry Street Garden Centre. We would also urge anyone with an interest in the school provision to attend the meeting tomorrow at 7:30pm at FBC.
|Join the Aborfield Garrison Residents Action Group (AG-RAG) mailing list|
|Visit this group|